Skip to content

refactor(vibenet): compact Race the Agent layout - #127

Merged
haardikk21 merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
validity-race-layout-polish
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

refactor(vibenet): compact Race the Agent layout#127
haardikk21 merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
validity-race-layout-polish

Conversation

@haardikk21

@haardikk21 haardikk21 commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • feature Race the Agent before Conditional Swaps on the Validity Transactions page
  • remove the automatic setup and reset controls from Race the Agent
  • combine Shared onchain switch and Comparison into one bounded card
  • keep Manual and Validity attempt panels at stable equal heights with internal scrolling
  • use a two-column desktop layout with the vertically stacked Guided race beside the combined condition/comparison card
  • order the guided flow as automatic agent, manual transaction, then pre-submitted validity transaction
  • remove redundant condition and comparison-result pills
  • move the singleton address and contract balance into Advanced details
  • place Observed chain state before Advanced details
  • preserve bottom-aligned action buttons at desktop and stacked widths

Stack

Verification

  • Race the Agent and conditional withdrawal tests passed
  • npm run typecheck
  • targeted ESLint
  • npm run build
  • populated Playwright screenshots reviewed at 1440x1000 in light and application dark mode

Screenshots

Light mode

Race the Agent light mode

Dark mode

Race the Agent dark mode

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
omni-ui Ready Ready Preview Sep 3, 2026 7:58pm UTC

Request Review

@cb-heimdall

cb-heimdall commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

1 similar comment
@cb-heimdall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

BrianBland
BrianBland previously approved these changes Sep 3, 2026
@haardikk21
haardikk21 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2026
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue because a pull request earlier in the stack was removed Sep 3, 2026
haardikk21 and others added 9 commits September 3, 2026 15:57
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
haardikk21 and others added 3 commits September 3, 2026 15:57
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenCode <opencode-noreply@coinbase.com>
@haardikk21
haardikk21 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2026
Base automatically changed from validity-simple-withdrawal-contract to main September 3, 2026 20:06
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5bba4c5 Sep 3, 2026
13 of 19 checks passed
@haardikk21
haardikk21 deleted the validity-race-layout-polish branch September 3, 2026 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants